E-mail List Archives
Links vs. static text URLs
From: Wright, Eric [USA]
Date: Jul 25, 2016 8:59AM
- Next message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Links vs. static text URLs"
- Previous message: Karl Brown: "Re: font size reqs on legal disclaimer text"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Links vs. static text URLs"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread
It seems intuitive that when working with authoring tools that allow you to create hypertext, active links should be preferred to static text URLs. The text <p>https://www.example.com</p<https://www.example.com%3c/p>> is not focusable or actionable. It basically requires a user who wants to reference that URL to understand a string of text as a URL, and then copy and paste it into a browser's address bar. That said, would it be fair to fail such a construction under the WCAG 2.0 Parsing success criteria? Is there a better way to map this failure - or am I wrong to presume it a failure?
Thanks,
Eric Wright
Lead Technologist
Mobile 802-310-9138
www.boozallen.com<http://www.boozallen.com/>
- Next message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Links vs. static text URLs"
- Previous message: Karl Brown: "Re: font size reqs on legal disclaimer text"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Links vs. static text URLs"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread