E-mail List Archives
Re: Indicating primar and secondary action links to screen readers
From: Birkir R. Gunnarsson
Date: Sep 7, 2016 11:11AM
- Next message: Lucy Greco: "Re: Indicating primar and secondary action links to screen readers"
- Previous message: Sailesh Panchang: "Re: Indicating primar and secondary action links to screen readers"
- Next message in Thread: Lucy Greco: "Re: Indicating primar and secondary action links to screen readers"
- Previous message in Thread: Sailesh Panchang: "Re: Indicating primar and secondary action links to screen readers"
- View all messages in this Thread
Yeap, I err on the side of Sailesh's post here.
I don't think screen readers need the visual emphasis that helps other
users, such as people with cognitive impairment, identify the primary
action item on a page.
My gut instinct is to recommend removing the screen reader only text
indicating this styling, because I don't quite see that it helps the
uesrs any, it just adds to verbosity.
Cheers and thanks guys
On 9/7/16, Sailesh Panchang < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> A very strong vote for not using markup / structure that developers
> don't have to invent and browsers / At do not support (uniformly) ...
> like aria-roledescription
> Proper heading structure will provide suitable context.
> A user can discover primary purpose or topic of a page from page title
> / h1 markup and review content that follows for primary action.
> Is it clear explicitly that The intent for styling 'Register'
> distinctly is to highlight difference between primary vs secondary
> only? Do users realize this or only the author?
> Also, as already stated, if it resembles a button, maybe it should be a
> button.
> Surely the 'Register' element can be styled distinctively so it grabs
> visual attention but no additional markup to aid accessibility is
> needed. ... Just like Submit and Cancel buttons can have different
> colors for visual identification as long as their purpose is clear
> via text.
> Regards,
> Sailesh Panchang
>
>
> On 9/7/16, Jeevan Reddy < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>> the better way to communicating the primary and secondary actions is
>> to use button semantics to the primary action and link semantics for
>> the secondary action.. if the native button semantics can't permit you
>> then use 'aria button role'.
>> Cheers
>> Jeevan Reddy
>>
>> On 9/7/16, Jim Homme < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> If I understand what you are saing, then this might lend itself to
>>> headings
>>> and sub-headings, as in h2 and h3, lists and nested lists, or some other
>>> autoatically-speaking structure that developers don't have to invent.
>>>
>>> Jim
>>>
>>>
>>> =========>>> Jim Homme,
>>> Accessibility Consultant,
>>> Bender HighTest Accessibility Team
>>> Bender Consulting Services, Inc.,
>>> 412-787-8567,
>>> <EMAIL REMOVED>
>>> http://www.benderconsult.com/our%20services/hightest-accessible-technology-solutions
>>> E+R=O
>>>
>>>
- Next message: Lucy Greco: "Re: Indicating primar and secondary action links to screen readers"
- Previous message: Sailesh Panchang: "Re: Indicating primar and secondary action links to screen readers"
- Next message in Thread: Lucy Greco: "Re: Indicating primar and secondary action links to screen readers"
- Previous message in Thread: Sailesh Panchang: "Re: Indicating primar and secondary action links to screen readers"
- View all messages in this Thread