E-mail List Archives
Re: Tab navigation for non-interactive content?
From: JP Jamous
Date: Oct 28, 2016 3:27AM
- Next message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Should disabled elements receive tab focus"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Should disabled elements receive tab focus"
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Tab navigation for non-interactive content?"
- Previous message in Thread: Mallory: "Re: Tab navigation for non-interactive content?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Patrick,
Funny you mentioned this. I was in a meeting with UX and UI managers yesterday and I think my recommendations were not welcomed by all of my audience.
I was complaining about labels that were used as radio buttons. The devs completely masked them as radio buttons. As we were debating that, one thing came up that I took in consideration as I try to be open minded. A radio button is a radio button, you cannot style it with round corners or square ones or make it look cool. To achieve that desirable outcome they do that with Divs and other elements.
Of course, JAWS and NVDA were having issues with the focus. JAWS would repeat the text a few times stating unselected and selected. So go figure out what status the radio button is in. NVDA, on the other hand, would not state anything as I up or down arrow through the list. However, visually it was changing between the radio buttons because of the tabindex that was applied to the label. In other words, it is receiving keyboard commands and not necessary NVDA commands.
We settled on ensuring that devs do not approach this concept like that anymore. Stick to proper semantic.
I continue to run into buttons and links and all kinds of elements that are masked as another element. Personally, I think it is pathetic. We have DOM elements that we are masking as other DOM elements.
I wish W3 would come out with an update for HTML 5 and add an element called object and that can be only to create a custom control. That way browsers can provide keyboard access to it, SR manufacturers can provide support for it and so on.
Trust me, we are not the only folks who are unhappy with that approach. SEO managers frown big time on things similar to that as they backfire on SEO.
I hope we can overcome this issue someday.
- Next message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Should disabled elements receive tab focus"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: Should disabled elements receive tab focus"
- Next message in Thread: Birkir R. Gunnarsson: "Re: Tab navigation for non-interactive content?"
- Previous message in Thread: Mallory: "Re: Tab navigation for non-interactive content?"
- View all messages in this Thread