E-mail List Archives
Re: Tab navigation for non-interactive content?
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Oct 28, 2016 8:05AM
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Tab navigation for non-interactive content?"
- Previous message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Tab navigation for non-interactive content?"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Tab navigation for non-interactive content?"
- Previous message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Tab navigation for non-interactive content?"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 28/10/2016 14:57, Jonathan Avila wrote:
> Sam Joehl and I had a twitter conversation with Steve that doesn't
> seemed to be listed in the thread where we list some situations where
> it is important. For example, for terms of service or scrolling
> areas. If the scrolling area is not keyboard focusable or there is
> not keyboard focusable content in it a keyboard only user or a user
> of speech recognition will not be able to access that content outside
> the scrollable area.
And this is why the warning is a "SHOULD NOT", rather than a "MUST NOT".
If you can justify the use of tabindex greater than zero on something
with good conscience, then that's fine.
> There also may be some other readonly type content that isn't in a
> readonly field like redemption or promotion codes or other things
> that may need to be copied via the keyboard where the user may not
> have access to caret browsing, etc.
But then why isn't it in a readonly field?
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Tab navigation for non-interactive content?"
- Previous message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Tab navigation for non-interactive content?"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Tab navigation for non-interactive content?"
- Previous message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Tab navigation for non-interactive content?"
- View all messages in this Thread