E-mail List Archives
RE: Bobby Approved
From: julian.rickards
Date: Aug 5, 2003 6:50AM
- Next message: Ben Morrison: "Re: Bobby Approved"
- Previous message: Ben Morrison: "Bobby Approved"
- Next message in Thread: Ben Morrison: "Re: Bobby Approved"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread
I know that some professional web developers will only provide a Photoshop
mockup to their clients so that their clients can't steal the webpages and
continue to develop them without paying the original designer. I don't know
if that is where you are coming from - in that case, you can't really
provide a mockup that is accessible. If that is not your concern, why not
create a page and prove its accessibility with Bobby.
The other possibility is just to simply state that you understand the WCAG
and know how to apply it and when the work is done, the page(s) will have
valid Bobby logos on them.
Jules
> With a bobby approved logo, it seems fine to me apart from
> missing Doctype
> and other Valid HTML/CSS issues. It wont let me test it online either.
>
> Since I cannot actually send them a site we have built that
> will pass the
> bobby online test how do we go about saying/showing them that we can.
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
- Next message: Ben Morrison: "Re: Bobby Approved"
- Previous message: Ben Morrison: "Bobby Approved"
- Next message in Thread: Ben Morrison: "Re: Bobby Approved"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread