E-mail List Archives
Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis
From: jeff newman
Date: Aug 6, 2003 9:15AM
- Next message: Mark Fletcher: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- Previous message: Miriam Frost Jungwirth: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- Next message in Thread: Mark Fletcher: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- Previous message in Thread: Miriam Frost Jungwirth: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- View all messages in this Thread
> Yes, thanks that is a good point. But would you ever just use CSS rather
> than EM or Strong?
Personally, I'd use it to save space.
<em>this is bold</em>
takes up a lot less space than
<span class=strong>this is bold</span> or however you want to structure it.
Even if you're using CSS you still have to mark up where your
emphasis/strong begins and ends. It's much simpler to just use the
appropriate tag than to create a class/div/selector. The only time I can
think of using a CSS solution that doesn't involve <em> or <strong> would
be if I needed different kinds of emphasis for some reason.
Unless I'm totally missing the point of what you're asking (which is
possible... it's only 11:10am... groan....)
jeff
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
- Next message: Mark Fletcher: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- Previous message: Miriam Frost Jungwirth: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- Next message in Thread: Mark Fletcher: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- Previous message in Thread: Miriam Frost Jungwirth: "Re: Semantic markup vs CSS styling for emphasis"
- View all messages in this Thread