E-mail List Archives

Re: Remote Usability Testing for AT users

for

From: Jonathan Avila
Date: May 26, 2017 8:27AM


> For moderated remote testing on websites or desktop-based applications, that usually just means finding a screensharing tool that's accessible.

I've personally had good luck with Zoom video conferencing being accessible on Windows.

Jonathan Avila


-----Original Message-----
From: WebAIM-Forum [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Caitlin Geier
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 1:58 PM
To: <EMAIL REMOVED> ; WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Remote Usability Testing for AT users

I only just stumbled across this; I've been struggling with this for a little while, but have come up with a few solutions.

The main key with testing with users with disabilities, particularly if they use assistive technology to help them, is to find a way for them to be able to do testing using their own devices. When testing with users who use devices like screen readers, it's also important for whatever you're testing to be fully coded and at least marginally accessible to begin with.
Screen reader users and users who can't use a mouse tend to be the most challenging to test with because the technology used to do the remote testing needs to be accessible to them.

For moderated remote testing on websites or desktop-based applications, that usually just means finding a screensharing tool that's accessible.
Screensharing tools I've used that are reasonably accessible (i.e.
keyboard-only and screen reader users can actually access the functionality to share their own screen):
* Google Hangouts
* Webex

It's good to check if the user has been able to successfully share their screen with others in the past using a particular tool before you ask them to do it for you. If they've successfully shared their screen with a tool you've never used, see if you can get access to that tool and try it out.
Otherwise, if you want to try screensharing with a tool your user has never used before, you will need to be VERY familiar with how the tool works with both a keyboard and a screen reader so that you can instruct the user you're working with in how to use the tool to share their screen.

Asking your user to share their screen with you can be enormously helpful, because you can follow along with them much more easily and help them if they get stuck on something unrelated to what you're testing. But sometimes asking your user to share their screen is too much of a hardship. You can also get by by simply doing the test over the phone and asking your user to describe what they're seeing (or hearing) on the page in detail while you follow along on your own screen. It helps - but isn't necessary - to have some familiarity with the keyboard accessibility and screen reader accessibility of the site or application you're testing before you do testing over the phone so you can follow along more easily.

I wrote a 2-part article about this a little while back: Part 1 is about considerations for remote testing in general <https://www.deque.com/blog/real-time-remote-usability-testing-screen-reader-users-part-1-practical-overview/>,
and Part 2 is about planning the test
<https://www.deque.com/blog/real-time-remote-usability-testing-screen-reader-users-part-2-tips-tricks/>
.

Another option for screen reader users which I've just started experimenting with is using NVDA Remote to allow an NVDA user to test a site / application remotely using my computer. Basically, the user controls my computer using a connection between their copy of NVDA and my copy of NVDA. There's a similar feature for newer versions of JAWS which I haven't tried (JAWS is expensive). The advantage here is that you can a test non-public version of the site or application, or test things with a more complicated set-up (for example, something which involves installing a plugin or going through an unrelated workflow to get to the workflow you want to test). The disadvantage is you have to have the screen reader installed on your own computer and know at least the basics of how to use it. You also have to make sure that the person on the other end uses that screen reader as their primary screen reader, or else they might spend the whole test stumbling about with a screen reader they're not very familiar with.

If you're open to unmoderated testing as an option, you can use Loop11 <https://www.loop11.com/web-accessibility-connecting-your-business-to-web-users-with-disabilities/>
to test with users with disabilities. Their interface is accessibility for keyboard-only and screen reader users. Loop11 has also partnered with Knowbility and can help you recruit users with specific disabilities to do testing for you. I've not used this service personally, but I hear good things. If you don't have much experience with how people with disabilities use websites, I would highly recommended doing moderated testing (remote or
otherwise) first.

-Caitlin

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Murray Inman (DZZEX54291) < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:

> Yes! Me too! Me too!
>
> [image: Rio Salado College Logo]
> [image: Rio Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/RioSaladoCollege> [image:
> Rio Twitter] <https://twitter.com/RioSaladoOnline> [image: Rio
> YouTube] <http://www.youtube.com/user/riosaladocollege>; [image: Rio
> Google+] <https://plus.google.com/+riosalado/about>
> *Murray Inman*
> Director, Instructional Media and Technology Lead, Digital
> Accessibility Response Team
> Tel: 480-517-8561 | Fax: 480-377-4817 | <EMAIL REMOVED>
> 2323 W. 14th Street Tempe, AZ 85281 | www.riosalado.edu
> ------------------------------
> A Maricopa Community College
> Strengths: Individualization
> <http://classweb.riosalado.edu/murray.inman/StrengthsQuest/>; |
> Ideation <http://classweb.riosalado.edu/murray.inman/StrengthsQuest/>;
> | Relator <http://classweb.riosalado.edu/murray.inman/StrengthsQuest/>;
> | Connectedness
> <http://classweb.riosalado.edu/murray.inman/StrengthsQuest/>; | Input
> <http://classweb.riosalado.edu/murray.inman/StrengthsQuest/>;
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Jordan Wilson <
> <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> wrote:
>
> > We’re looking for more information about Remote User Testing with
> > assistive technology users. We’ve done limited in-person user
> > testing
> with
> > AT users on a small scale, but our typical User Testing uses much
> > larger data sets and is typically done using Remote User Testing
> > software. So
> far
> > we’ve not found an accessible remote user testing platform that can
> > help
> us
> > scale.
> >
> > The goal of the user testing is to validate and test UX design decisions.
> >
> > How do you do AT user testing? Do recommend a particular remote user
> > testing platform that is accessible? Ideas welcome.
> >
> > I’m at CSUN so if you have a recommendation for a relevant session
> > or conversation please look me up.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jordan
> > @jordanwilson
> >
> >
> > > > > > archives at http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
> > > >
> > > archives at http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
> >



--
Caitlin Geier
User Experience Designer
<EMAIL REMOVED>