E-mail List Archives
Re: Misuse of TabIndex 0
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Jul 7, 2017 7:45AM
- Next message: Alastair Campbell: "Re: Example of a webpage that fails 1.4.4 (resizing hides content that scrolling can't reveal)"
- Previous message: Alastair Campbell: "Re: SC 1.2.2 and YouTube's auto captions"
- Next message in Thread: Graham Armfield: "Re: Misuse of TabIndex 0"
- Previous message in Thread: Sailesh Panchang: "Misuse of TabIndex 0"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 07/07/2017 14:35, Sailesh Panchang wrote:
> Michael,
> Does this not directly contravene SC 2.4.3: '...focusable components
> receive focus in an order that preserves meaning and operability'?
Going purely by the word of WCAG (if we want to split hairs), once you
add tabindex=0 you've made an element focusable, so it's just the order
that matters.
I do however usually note unnecessary tab stops on non-interactive
controls under 2.4.3 (and, under certain situations, cross-reference the
failure from 2.1.1 Keyboard as well).
I wouldn't say it fails 2.4.7 though, because once you've made an
element that's not normally focusable focusable, then it needs to have a
visible focus indication. The fact that it shouldn't be focusable in the
first place is no excuse for not indicating the focus visibly.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Alastair Campbell: "Re: Example of a webpage that fails 1.4.4 (resizing hides content that scrolling can't reveal)"
- Previous message: Alastair Campbell: "Re: SC 1.2.2 and YouTube's auto captions"
- Next message in Thread: Graham Armfield: "Re: Misuse of TabIndex 0"
- Previous message in Thread: Sailesh Panchang: "Misuse of TabIndex 0"
- View all messages in this Thread