E-mail List Archives
Re: Guidelines on making <i> icons accessible?
From: Chagnon | PubCom
Date: Jul 23, 2017 3:23PM
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Guidelines on making icons accessible?"
- Previous message: Preast, Vanessa: "Guidelines on making icons accessible?"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Guidelines on making icons accessible?"
- Previous message in Thread: Preast, Vanessa: "Guidelines on making icons accessible?"
- View all messages in this Thread
I've never understood why <i> was set as a standard (or a convention) for icons in the first place.
It's the original HTML tag for italic text that indicates just a change in the visual appearance (as opposed to <em> which places meaning behind the visual appearance).
Maybe this is an example of too many chefs in the standards-making kitchen. In basic programming, it's not wise to take an existing tag or code structure and use it for a different purpose. Code tends to not work well or as predicted when we do that, especially when the 2 standards exist in the same product, such as <i> used in an HTML webpage where it's not italic but instead an icon.
Stack Overflow has a couple of threads on this topic that might help you. Keep in mind that these are people discussing options, not necessarily stating what is required or acceptable for accessibility.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11135261/should-i-use-i-tag-for-icons-instead-of-span
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17471390/how-to-use-i-tag-with-icons
--Bevi Chagnon
- Next message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Guidelines on making icons accessible?"
- Previous message: Preast, Vanessa: "Guidelines on making icons accessible?"
- Next message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Guidelines on making icons accessible?"
- Previous message in Thread: Preast, Vanessa: "Guidelines on making icons accessible?"
- View all messages in this Thread