E-mail List Archives
Library Digital Repositories
From: Alan Zaitchik
Date: Mar 15, 2018 7:41PM
- Next message: pratik roy: "aria-describedat In or Not In"
- Previous message: Ryan E. Benson: "Re: Selects with drop downs"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread
I want to broaden a question I posted earlier with too narrow a focus.
Other things being equal, how would you rate the degree of WCAG 2.0 compliance of various non-commercial library repository systems. I'm thinking of systems like DSpace and Fedora and Digital Commons. On the web I found comparisons from years ago, but nothing up to date.
We are actually quite interested in using DSpace, but they cannot guarantee compliance because of the way contributors are free to contribute code without a centralized check for conformance to DSpace development standards. (The standards do require WCAG 2.0 compliance, but "enforcement" is through the bug tracking system, with resultant delays in getting out bug fixes.) Is that approach considered acceptable, generally?
Anyone have relevant experience or suggestions? Pointer to a recent analysis?
Thanks in advance,
Alan
- Next message: pratik roy: "aria-describedat In or Not In"
- Previous message: Ryan E. Benson: "Re: Selects with drop downs"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread