E-mail List Archives
Re: Query on heading hierarchy
From: Kevin Prince
Date: Mar 25, 2018 4:09PM
- Next message: Vemaarapu Venkatesh: "Re: Required fields with Talkback"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: Query on heading hierarchy"
- Next message in Thread: Fernand van Olphen: "Re: Query on heading hierarchy"
- Previous message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Query on heading hierarchy"
- View all messages in this Thread
Well said Karen. I'm far less bothered by a jump in heading level which makes sense than I am by slavishly saying all is good because the sighted and mark-up are equally as illogical.. If the document using confused visual styles (in the broadest sense - ie larger text/bold/underline/actual h levels) then there is clearly a cognitive issue in following the content which needs remediation before applying 1.3.1 to it.
Interestingly this doesn't appear to be addressed in any specific point in WCAG 2.0 - perhaps the time is right to move beyond merely technical checkpoints?
A colleague and I used to refer to the kind of issue we are discussing as âequal opportunity inaccessibility' - the page in question was accessible but equally unusable whether you can see it or not.
Kevin
Access1in5
0212220638
Independent Accessibility and IT Consultancy
- Next message: Vemaarapu Venkatesh: "Re: Required fields with Talkback"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: Query on heading hierarchy"
- Next message in Thread: Fernand van Olphen: "Re: Query on heading hierarchy"
- Previous message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Query on heading hierarchy"
- View all messages in this Thread