E-mail List Archives
Re: 4.1.1 Parsing > nested elements
From: Fernand van Olphen
Date: Mar 29, 2018 4:45AM
- Next message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: 4.1.1 Parsing > nested elements"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: 4.1.1 Parsing > nested elements"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "Re: 4.1.1 Parsing > nested elements"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "Re: 4.1.1 Parsing > nested elements"
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi Steve,
I agree with you that it is a PITA. But I feel that there is a subtle difference between guidance and instruction.
I have to have some ammo if I am auditing a website and in my report I state that SC 4.1.1 is not met because there are incorrect nested elements.
What if the developer is wcag-savvy, reads my report and slaps me back in my face, saying: :
Incorrect nested elements? According to the Sufficient Technique number 4 I do not have to nest elements correctly, because I can pass the SC by a combination of H74, H93 and H94. So, to hell with your incorrect nested elements!
What am I to say to him ? (Besides: you are fired!!!)
Fernand
De disclaimer van toepassing op e-mail van de gemeente Den Haag vindt u op: http://www.denhaag.nl/disclaimer
- Next message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: 4.1.1 Parsing > nested elements"
- Previous message: Steve Faulkner: "Re: 4.1.1 Parsing > nested elements"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "Re: 4.1.1 Parsing > nested elements"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Faulkner: "Re: 4.1.1 Parsing > nested elements"
- View all messages in this Thread