WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: closest alternatives to semantic UI

for

From: Brandon Keith Biggs
Date: May 2, 2018 2:52AM

Hello,
This email list and this thread in particular are not a place to report
issues like this. Please open an issue at:
https://github.com/WhatSock/accdc/issues
where it can properly be addressed.

AccDC is the best framework I have ever seen in my life from an UX point of
view. I am looking for someone to help convert it to ReactJS:
https://github.com/WhatSock/accdc/issues/10
So please comment if you are able to help!
Thanks,


Brandon Keith Biggs <http://brandonkeithbiggs.com/>;

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Steve Green < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
wrote:

> Hi Bryan,
>
> You never responded to the test results I sent you that showed that the
> your combobox example is flawed. I found that it works ok if users interact
> with it in certain ways and it behaves incorrectly if they interact in
> other ways. All those different ways of interacting a perfectly normal, and
> native comboboxes work correctly in every case. Since that was the simplest
> of all your combobox variants I saw no point testing the others until that
> one is fixed. Have you had a chance to review my results?
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: WebAIM-Forum < <EMAIL REMOVED> > On Behalf Of
> Bryan Garaventa
> Sent: 01 May 2018 23:20
> To: WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> Subject: Re: [WebAIM] closest alternatives to semantic UI
>
> Hi,
> All of the widgets within the AccDC TSG framework have been thoroughly
> tested to ensure accessibility, downloadable at
> https://github.com/whatsock/tsg The accessible widgets of which plug
> directly into jQuery, Dojo, or MooTools.
>
> You can test many of these yourself here:
> http://whatsock.com/bootstrap/jquery/
>
> "As far as I am aware, there are no front-end frameworks that are even
> remotely accessible."
>
> I remember us going back and forth about this not long ago on this list. I
> feel like a broken record sometimes.
>
>
>
>
> Bryan Garaventa
> Accessibility Fellow
> Level Access, Inc.
> <EMAIL REMOVED>
> 415.624.2709 (o)
> www.LevelAccess.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: WebAIM-Forum < <EMAIL REMOVED> > On Behalf Of
> Steve Green
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 9:35 PM
> To: WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> Subject: Re: [WebAIM] closest alternatives to semantic UI
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> As far as I am aware, there are no front-end frameworks that are even
> remotely accessible. If there are, then no one is using them. Most don't
> even do radio button and checkbox replacements properly, let alone rich
> controls.
>
> Steve Green
> Managing Director
> Test Partners Ltd
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: WebAIM-Forum < <EMAIL REMOVED> > On Behalf Of
> Michael Taboada
> Sent: 01 May 2018 01:28
> To: <EMAIL REMOVED>
> Subject: [WebAIM] closest alternatives to semantic UI
>
> Hi all,
>
> As a bit of an introduction, I am blind, and use screen readers. I also
> program in my spare time. To that end, I have been looking into replacing
> semantic UI (which I hear is not interested whatsoever to add accessibility
> to their framework) with something else in an open source project [1]. So
> I'm looking for recommendations for frontend frameworks that are fully
> accessible, but have similar or identical features to semantic UI. Of
> special note is that this particular application relies on rich controls
> such as searchable multiselect boxes, etc. Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Michael.
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea
>
>
> > > at http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
> > > > at http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
> > > > at http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
> > > > > >