E-mail List Archives
Re: Native or web?
From: glen walker
Date: Jan 29, 2019 9:42AM
- Next message: Barry Hill: "Re: Native or web?"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Native or web?"
- Next message in Thread: Barry Hill: "Re: Native or web?"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Native or web?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Interestingly enough, if you search for "markup" in WCAG 2.1, only three SC
have that phrase. Two of them are new SC:
- 1.3.6 Identify Purpose (AAA)
- 1.4.12 Text Spacing (AA) (which also mentions "text style properties",
The only WCAG 2.0 SC that mentions "markup" is:
- 4.1.1 Parsing (A)
4.1.1 is about as close to non-technology-agnostic as it comes because it
mentions "start and end tags", "attributes", and "IDs".
So Patrick is technically correct, but Joe is pretty correct too if you
consider 75 of the 78 SC in WCAG 2.1 are technology agnostic (96%).
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:42 AM Patrick H. Lauke < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> On 29/01/2019 15:37, <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:
> > The only difference is in
> > the recommendations to fix issues that are discovered during a review
> > (native code vs HTML).
> Not completely: for actual native apps any SCs relating to "In content
> implemented using markup languages" don't directly apply.
> Patrick H. Lauke