E-mail List Archives
Re: What about semi-bold?
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Feb 14, 2019 7:07PM
- Next message: Alan Zaitchik: "Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 167, Issue 12"
- Previous message: John Foliot: "Re: What about semi-bold?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: John Foliot: "Re: What about semi-bold?"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 15/02/2019 01:58, John Foliot wrote:
> This need for more specificity to the standard suggests it is a good
> candidate for a next-gen Success Criteria in WCAG 2.x, which I'll volunteer
> my buddy Patrick to support me in bringing back to the W3C.
I'll happily pass on touching anything to do with "regular" vs "bold",
as to be precise we'd really need to get into defining things down to
the stroke width level of individual typefaces used...which doesn't
sound like fun at all ;)
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Alan Zaitchik: "Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 167, Issue 12"
- Previous message: John Foliot: "Re: What about semi-bold?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: John Foliot: "Re: What about semi-bold?"
- View all messages in this Thread