E-mail List Archives
RE: What assistive technology does (and doesn't do)
From: Rachel Tanenhaus
Date: Dec 17, 2003 8:28AM
- Next message: Shane Anderson: "Re: conferences"
- Previous message: julian.rickards@ndm.gov.on.ca: "RE: What assistive technology does (and doesn't do)"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: julian.rickards@ndm.gov.on.ca: "RE: What assistive technology does (and doesn't do)"
- View all messages in this Thread
Tim gave me this fantabulous response:
<stuff deleted>
> I would say that if the information is not encoded in the mark-up, it
> should somehow be explicitly indicated in the page content.
That's a really useful rule! Thank you so much! (Even better, I can
explain it to designers, and they'll *get* it!)
> This is what I mean.
> <img src="picture.jpg">
> That mark-up tells you that the content is an image. It also
indicates
> where the image is located. It does not tell you what information the
> image may contain. Therefore, the alt attribute for the image does
not
> need to include information such as that this content is an image or
where > it is located (if that is important to the user.) It does need
to contain > other information that is not part of the mark-up for the
content.
> This is why it is so important to separate presentation from
structure.
> When the mark-up is serving double duty, it is no longer clear whether
> something like the h1 element is being used to indicate a level 1
header
> or just that someone wanted to use larger font sizes or whatever.
Indeed. I'll point that out to them too.
> Rachel, I personally have concerns about the approach of designing to
> common functionality. Which AT are we letting set the common
> functionality standard? Are we looking at just the most current
versions > or which versions are owned by what percentage of the user
population?
> When I answer those questions, I also seem to find serious flaws or
> concerns with the answers.
Exactly. And when I see that debate on some of these lists, I've
noticed that it's turned into something of a religious war - no one's
really going to convince anyone else anyway. :)
> I sometimes wonder if the best approach is just to design with
standards,
> test with real users (every chance possible,) remain open to
suggestions
> from customers, and use what you learn to improve upon future efforts.
La. I'm the choir. Preach on. :)
Unfortunately, so many people design web sites these days relying on
their authoring tools rather than knowledge of HTML that "design with
standards" is a new concept for them. I do emphasize in my trainings
that designers should involve real, honest-to-God people with
disabilities in evaluating their sites.
Thanks again for a useful and thoughtful response.
-Rachel
>
- Next message: Shane Anderson: "Re: conferences"
- Previous message: julian.rickards@ndm.gov.on.ca: "RE: What assistive technology does (and doesn't do)"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: julian.rickards@ndm.gov.on.ca: "RE: What assistive technology does (and doesn't do)"
- View all messages in this Thread