E-mail List Archives
Re: Synchronised media ambiguity again
From: Jonathan Avila
Date: Sep 8, 2020 7:32AM
- Next message: Romaric Pascal: "Marking up a countdown timer"
- Previous message: Jonathan C. Cohn: "Re: Synchronised media ambiguity again"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Synchronised media ambiguity again"
- Previous message in Thread: Jonathan C. Cohn: "Re: Synchronised media ambiguity again"
- View all messages in this Thread
It seems like this is the heart of the discussion - must a video with ambient sound be considered synchronized video with synchronized requirements. This means that captions would be required even if the captions were to only show music symbols or perhaps a short description of the type of music playing. If the video contained images that communicate feeling then audio description would be needed rather than a transcript for Level AA.
Regarding WCAG SC 1.2.1 it seems to say "video only" and "audio only" content. There is no clear situation for combined video and audio content where one aspect is decorative. And what if there were - what is the factor in determining if an image or sound is meaningful or decorative? Music sets mood and images convey feeling.
Jonathan
- Next message: Romaric Pascal: "Marking up a countdown timer"
- Previous message: Jonathan C. Cohn: "Re: Synchronised media ambiguity again"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Synchronised media ambiguity again"
- Previous message in Thread: Jonathan C. Cohn: "Re: Synchronised media ambiguity again"
- View all messages in this Thread