E-mail List Archives
Re: Bypass blocks for a small website
From: wolfgang.berndorfer
Date: Oct 6, 2020 11:59AM
- Next message: glen walker: "Re: Bypass blocks for a small website"
- Previous message: Laura Fathauer: "Re: Image Reading with voice over"
- Next message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Bypass blocks for a small website"
- Previous message in Thread: Vaibhav Saraf: "Re: Bypass blocks for a small website"
- View all messages in this Thread
Thanks Glen for information and clarification.
I agree that a distinction between normative and moral requirements is
necessary. But I'd like to add the requirement of an interpretation of
normative materia, especially when the publishing date is sensitive for the
content.
So what would the authors of SC 1.3.1 have fixed as required, if landmarks
were available in 2008?
On the other hand: Why is there still no explicit requirement? (I didn't
follow the discussions during the development of WCAG 2.1 and 2.2 very
well.)
But probably the WAI list and GitHub would be the right place for such a
discussion.
Wolfgang
- Next message: glen walker: "Re: Bypass blocks for a small website"
- Previous message: Laura Fathauer: "Re: Image Reading with voice over"
- Next message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Bypass blocks for a small website"
- Previous message in Thread: Vaibhav Saraf: "Re: Bypass blocks for a small website"
- View all messages in this Thread