E-mail List Archives
Re: Providing the correct information about a redundant link
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Oct 21, 2020 11:23AM
- Next message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Providing the correct information about a redundant link"
- Previous message:
: "Providing the correct information about a redundant link" - Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Providing the correct information about a redundant link"
- Previous message in Thread:
: "Providing the correct information about a redundant link" - View all messages in this Thread
On 21/10/2020 17:51, ÐÑеволод Ðопов wrote:
[...]
> Standards and guidelines:
> https://webaim.org/standards/wcag/checklist#sc2.4.4
I would not point to WebAim in terms of "standards and guidelines", but
to the actual WCAG SC
https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#link-purpose-in-context (and maybe point
to the webaim checklist there as an additional resource, something like
"See also ...")
Also, as an aside, I don't think a redundant link is an actual WCAG
failure (if the link with the same text goes to the same URL). it would
fail 2.4.4 if it had the same text but was going to different places.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Providing the correct information about a redundant link"
- Previous message:
: "Providing the correct information about a redundant link" - Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Providing the correct information about a redundant link"
- Previous message in Thread:
: "Providing the correct information about a redundant link" - View all messages in this Thread