E-mail List Archives
Re: efficient accessibility audit process
From: Julius Serrano
Date: Nov 22, 2020 11:48AM
- Next message: Julius Serrano: "Re: Efficient Accessibility Audit Process"
- Previous message: L Snider: "Re: PDF resize"
- Next message in Thread: Julius Serrano: "Re: Efficient Accessibility Audit Process"
- Previous message in Thread: Peter Shikli: "Re: Efficient Accessibility Audit Process"
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi Steve.
Thanks for sharing your insights.
My goal is to learn how we can make accessibility audits a team effort.
The intention behind it is the idea if more people are involved in the
company, accessibility would be recognised and supported by more people.
And, as I am open to other ideas, I truly value your thoughts on how
efficient it will be if only one person was performing the audit.
Thanks again.
Julius
 z
On 20/11/2020 10:12 am, Steve Green wrote:
> I don't accept your premise that you will maximise productivity by involving the entire team. I would expect that to minimise productivity.
>
> For maximum productivity, we get one person to do all the work. Obviously, they need all the necessary skills, so we recruit people who do. Why would you not do that? The one exception is that we sometimes get someone junior to do the colour contrast analysis - it doesn't take long to teach almost anyone.
>
> Occasionally, the timescale means we have to put more than one tester on a project, in which case they form a self-managing team with one tester taking the lead role.
>
> Is there anything about your context that means you can't do this?
>
> Steve Green
> Managing Director
> Test Partners Ltd
>
>
>
- Next message: Julius Serrano: "Re: Efficient Accessibility Audit Process"
- Previous message: L Snider: "Re: PDF resize"
- Next message in Thread: Julius Serrano: "Re: Efficient Accessibility Audit Process"
- Previous message in Thread: Peter Shikli: "Re: Efficient Accessibility Audit Process"
- View all messages in this Thread