E-mail List Archives
Re: Fwd: VPAT for U508
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Feb 5, 2021 9:34AM
- Next message: Radhika Takyar: "Immersive Reader"
- Previous message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Fwd: VPAT for U508"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Fwd: VPAT for U508"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 05/02/2021 13:55, Jonathan Avila wrote:
> The VPAT format does allow for tables to be removed when they don't apply and since AAA doesn't apply to 508 - for example when using an international ACR it would make sense to remove the table and state that fact.
As a probably weird aside, I just wanted to jump in and high-five
Jonathan for calling it an ACR (I thought I was the only pedant around
that insisted that "VPAT is the *template* ... what comes out of it at
the other end is the ACR" - a la "Frankenstein was the doctor, not the
monster". Then again even ITI end up calling the end result a VPAT, so
perhaps it's a losing battle either way...)
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Radhika Takyar: "Immersive Reader"
- Previous message: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Fwd: VPAT for U508"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Jonathan Avila: "Re: Fwd: VPAT for U508"
- View all messages in this Thread