E-mail List Archives
Can someone explain the following Accessibility checker results in Office 365?
From: Farough, David (CFP/PSC)
Date: Mar 3, 2021 12:59PM
- Next message: glen walker: "Re: Can someone explain the following Accessibility checker results in Office 365?"
- Previous message: Swift, Daniel P.: "Re: Graphical element instead of the role link presence. How should I report it?"
- Next message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Can someone explain the following Accessibility checker results in Office 365?"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread
I looked at a document that I had previously checked for accessibility in office 2013.
I had insured at the time that all table header rows were set to repeat at the top of page so that they would be considered to be header rows for the tables.
Now when inspecting the document in office 365 the accessibility checker reports all of these tables as having no header rows despite the fact that they are still marked appropriately in the rows page of the table properties dialogue.
Can anyone tell me what selecting the 'use first row as header" option in the recommendations menu does and whether it actually makes a difference to the accessibility of the table.
More importantly, will it be necessary to make similar changes to our other office 2013 documents?
Thanks for any information you can provide.
- Next message: glen walker: "Re: Can someone explain the following Accessibility checker results in Office 365?"
- Previous message: Swift, Daniel P.: "Re: Graphical element instead of the role link presence. How should I report it?"
- Next message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Can someone explain the following Accessibility checker results in Office 365?"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread