E-mail List Archives
Re: The importance of landmarks to screen readers?
From: Murphy, Sean
Date: Apr 1, 2021 4:07PM
- Next message: Ryan E. Benson: "Re: How does Section 508 apply to documents?"
- Previous message: Steve Green: "Re: How does Section 508 apply to documents?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Peter Weil: "Re: The importance of landmarks to screen readers?"
- View all messages in this Thread
All,
Very interesting discussion. The standards for HTMl5.2 really make some of the different type of sections (regions) such as header, footer and main fairly clear from a document structure view. EG: the main must be a child of the body. While footer and header can be a child of the body or the main. From memory Nav is not so clear. They do provide good guidelines on usage. They do provide code examples as well. I haven't seen any conversation or references related to the standards here. The standards also discuss ARIA usage.
From a practical and user point of view. The average screen reader user on desktop I do not think knows the concept of regions. Thus they don't use them. I would have to double check mobile, but I don't think you can navigate by regions on voiceover or talkback. I have seen web sites which over use landmark regions. Thus the page becomes very noisy for the screen reader user.
The core principle of what a region function is over a header I think is the key to the confusion. I see a region of a means of grouping a common components or information together. If you have 10 product cards for example. Then a <section aria-label="Product cards"> would be a means of assisting the user to understand the structure of the page. Then the headers within the section can break up each product. This is a good usage of a section.
The HTML 5 standards are not the easiest to read and hence, leads to confusion.
Regards
Sean Murphy
Sean Murphy | Senior Digital System specialist (Accessibility)
Telstra Digital Channels | Digital Systems
Mobile: 0405 129 739 | Desk: (02) 9866-7917
Digital Systems Launch Page
Accessibility Single source of Truth
-----Original Message-----
From: WebAIM-Forum < <EMAIL REMOVED> > On Behalf Of Peter Weil
Sent: Thursday, 1 April 2021 1:45 AM
To: WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] The importance of landmarks to screen readers?
[External Email] This email was sent from outside the organisation â be cautious, particularly with links and attachments.
There's also a really good ongoing discussion about this entire issue, with links to related discussions:
https://github.com/w3c/html-aam/issues/86#issue-221936168
It sounds as though they're moving towards restricting mapping <aside> to complementary under certain circumstances (among other things), so that it's not always a landmark. And also allowing <aside> as a landmark within <main>. But the specs, the best practices, the guidelines, the examples, etc., all need to be brought into alignment.
Peter
On 3/30/21, 10:23 AM, "WebAIM-Forum" < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
The best place to get an official decision from the Accessibility Guidelines working group on a situation that is not already documented in materials is to log a github issue at: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues
This isn't a legal source but it's the best place we have now on what the group that created WCAG has come to consensus on.
Jonathan
- Next message: Ryan E. Benson: "Re: How does Section 508 apply to documents?"
- Previous message: Steve Green: "Re: How does Section 508 apply to documents?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Peter Weil: "Re: The importance of landmarks to screen readers?"
- View all messages in this Thread