E-mail List Archives
Re: Is color alone for links, with enough color contrast, sufficient - SC 1.4.1. A
From: glen walker
Date: Jan 26, 2022 12:04PM
- Next message: Christine Hogenkamp: "Accessibility user testing - single website project - looking for price quotes"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: accessible calendar controls"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Is color alone for links, with enough color contrast, sufficient - SC 1.4.1. A"
- Previous message in Thread: Sven Jenzer: "Is color alone for links, with enough color contrast, sufficient - SC 1.4.1. A"
- View all messages in this Thread
I'm curious what prompted your question. Do you think G183 is going away?
I have not heard that so it's still a valid way to pass 1.4.1.
Is it the preferred way? I personally don't think so. I think links
embedded in text should stand out on their own without requiring hovering
or keyboard focus. Underlining has been the standard since the beginning
but you could have them be bold or italic or a larger font or a different
font family. That might make some minimalist designers cringe.
- Next message: Christine Hogenkamp: "Accessibility user testing - single website project - looking for price quotes"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: accessible calendar controls"
- Next message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: Is color alone for links, with enough color contrast, sufficient - SC 1.4.1. A"
- Previous message in Thread: Sven Jenzer: "Is color alone for links, with enough color contrast, sufficient - SC 1.4.1. A"
- View all messages in this Thread