E-mail List Archives
Re: Is color alone for links, with enough color contrast, sufficient - SC 1.4.1. A
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Jan 28, 2022 9:29AM
- Next message: Krystal Iseminger: "Present at Accessibility Summer Camp 2022"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: Is color alone for links, with enough color contrast, sufficient - SC 1.4.1. A"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Is color alone for links, with enough color contrast, sufficient - SC 1.4.1. A"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 28/01/2022 16:14, glen walker wrote:
> If the proposed wording becomes accepted,
It's been accepted by AGWG and merged into the editor's draft, just not
published yet (though of course it could become "unaccepted" I guess if
somebody made a PR that removes it again before the next scheduled
publication when the editor's draft is pushed out to the stable URL, but
that would then also need to get AGWG consensus)
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Krystal Iseminger: "Present at Accessibility Summer Camp 2022"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: Is color alone for links, with enough color contrast, sufficient - SC 1.4.1. A"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Is color alone for links, with enough color contrast, sufficient - SC 1.4.1. A"
- View all messages in this Thread