E-mail List Archives
Re: Tab controls and WCAG 1.4.10 Reflow
From: Niranjan Vala
Date: Mar 31, 2022 1:36AM
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Tab controls and WCAG 1.4.10 Reflow"
- Previous message: Steve Green: "Re: Tab controls and WCAG 1.4.10 Reflow"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Tab controls and WCAG 1.4.10 Reflow"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Tab controls and WCAG 1.4.10 Reflow"
- View all messages in this Thread
I also think that horizontal tabs should be made responsive for all screen
sizes so it meets with the Reflow WCAG success criterion. For smaller
screen sizes, it should be vertically stacked and for bigger screens, It
can be aligned horizontally. In fact that is what I have seen on many
popular websites that uses tabs. There could be another approach in which
tabs with only icons with proper hidden but accessible labels can be used
so they can be aligned horizontally even on smaller screen sizes.
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 11:31, Steve Green < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
wrote:
> This exact issue came up last week in an IAAP discussion, and our team
> discussed it internally for more than an hour. It seems simple at first,
> but it raises the question of what "scrolling" means, among other things.
> The WCAG authors must have assumed it's obvious, because they do not
> provide a definition.
>
> Opinion was split, both in IAAP and in our team. My view is that a Tab
> component does not require two-dimensional layout, and that the tabs can
> perfectly well wrap onto two or more lines. Indeed, I failed one of our
> clients' sites on this exact issue.
>
> Steve Green
> Managing Director
> Test Partners Ltd
>
>
>
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Tab controls and WCAG 1.4.10 Reflow"
- Previous message: Steve Green: "Re: Tab controls and WCAG 1.4.10 Reflow"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Tab controls and WCAG 1.4.10 Reflow"
- Previous message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Tab controls and WCAG 1.4.10 Reflow"
- View all messages in this Thread