E-mail List Archives
Re: When to use WCAG 2.4.3and WCAG 2.1.1
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Apr 22, 2022 8:59AM
- Next message: Mark Magennis: "Re: When to use WCAG 2.4.3and WCAG 2.1.1"
- Previous message: jp Jamous: "Re: When to use WCAG 2.4.3and WCAG 2.1.1"
- Next message in Thread: Mark Magennis: "Re: When to use WCAG 2.4.3and WCAG 2.1.1"
- Previous message in Thread: jp Jamous: "Re: When to use WCAG 2.4.3and WCAG 2.1.1"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 22/04/2022 15:32, jp Jamous wrote:
> Reinhard,
>
> I don't know of a reference that would give you such comparison. I can help you explain it, but you are not allowed to plagiarize. *Smiles*
>
> I am going to keep my explanation simple and to the point, without covering the technical aspect of it.
> 2.1.1 focuses on ensuring that every HTML element that can be operated by a user is responsive to keyboard functionality. In other words, if it can be operated via the mouse, it must be fully operable via the keyboard. It's that simple.
Slight tweak: it's making sure *functionality* that can be operated via
the mouse (or touch, or whatever other input) can also be operated with
the keyboard. This may or may not be tied to a specific HTML element per se.
You could have an interface made purely from non-focusable controls that
respond to mouse clicks, and in parallel have a whole set of key event
listeners on the body of the page that let you trigger the same
functionality that a mouse user could, and it would pass 2.1.1, for
instance.
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: Mark Magennis: "Re: When to use WCAG 2.4.3and WCAG 2.1.1"
- Previous message: jp Jamous: "Re: When to use WCAG 2.4.3and WCAG 2.1.1"
- Next message in Thread: Mark Magennis: "Re: When to use WCAG 2.4.3and WCAG 2.1.1"
- Previous message in Thread: jp Jamous: "Re: When to use WCAG 2.4.3and WCAG 2.1.1"
- View all messages in this Thread