E-mail List Archives
Re: Website evaluations
Date: Jun 28, 2022 11:55AM
- Next message: Steve Green: "Re: Website evaluations"
- Previous message: Kevin Prince: "Re: accessible chatbot"
- Next message in Thread: Steve Green: "Re: Website evaluations"
- Previous message in Thread: Peter Shikli: "Re: Website evaluations"
- View all messages in this Thread
If I am asked before evaluation and generally in my evaluation report I suggest:
1. Care about your code by html validation. Each technician should know about https://validator.w3.org/ an know about solving announced errors or warnings. It is annoying to report the small once one techs.
2. Put away your mouse and then try out to use your navigation and forms. That is not black pedagogy, that is reminding of craft.
Hardly any keyboard and focus failure, audio and video SC can be found with tools or manual testing. So e have to extend responsibility to authors.
From: WebAIM-Forum < <EMAIL REMOVED> > On Behalf Of Birkir R. Gunnarsson
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2022 3:39 PM
To: WebAIM Discussion List < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Website evaluations
The general strategy is definitely a combination of an automated site crawler scan (a scan that crawls the site and scans every page) ad a manual accessiblity assessment of key pages and component
Contact Us page
Search page (if there is one)
Landing pages for key categories
One page per categry or template (say articles, blogs)
Any components used consistently across the site
* Any navigation menus or modal popups used consistently
* Check for videos and any online media player (make sure those are accessible and support closed captions and ideally audio description)
The automated scan can be done monthly (it's quick and, depending on what you choose, can be inexpensive) Manual assessments of key pages should be done quarterly (or less, depending on how often your site is updated).
Here are two options, depending on budget
Wav'es Accessibility I'm back service
(site scan + manual assessment of 4 pages for $500).
You may have to supplement with assessment of more pages and components.
If you want the lowest cost DIY possible:
Axe crawler (opensource):
(open source, runs Axe on every page), + you'd have to conduct manual reviews yourself or hire someone to do it.
All the big vendors, Deque/Level Access/TPGI offer some form of these services at various price point.
I've heard good things about Accessibility 360, but I've never used them directly.
On 6/24/22, Paul Rayius < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Hi Bevi,
> I'd recommend Accessible360. Here is their website:
> Paul Rayius
> Vice-President of Training
> -----Original Message-----
> From: WebAIM-Forum < <EMAIL REMOVED> > On Behalf Of
> <EMAIL REMOVED>
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 2:06 AM
> To: 'WebAIM Discussion List' < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> Subject: [WebAIM] Website evaluations
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
> and know the content is safe.
> Looking for guidance on having a website evaluated for accessibility
> Any suggestions for vendors you recommend, things to consider, or
> general advice is welcome!
> - - -
> Bevi Chagnon | Designer, Accessibility Technician |
> <EMAIL REMOVED> <mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> >
> - - -
> PubCom: Technologists for Accessible Design + Publishing
> consulting . training . development . design . sec. 508 services
> Upcoming classes at www.PubCom.com/ <http://www.pubcom.com/classes>
> - - -
> Latest blog-newsletter
> <https://mailchi.mp/e694edcdfadd/class-discount-3266574> - Simple
> Guide to Writing Alt-Text
> > > archives at http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
> > > > archives at http://webaim.org/discussion/archives
Work hard. Have fun. Make history.