E-mail List Archives
Re: Is it ok to intentionally break WCAG 2.5.3?
From: Birkir R. Gunnarsson
Date: Aug 20, 2022 8:36PM
- Next message: Mark Magennis: "Re: Tabpanel visible focus indicator"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: Is it ok to intentionally break WCAG 2.5.3?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Is it ok to intentionally break WCAG 2.5.3?"
- View all messages in this Thread
That's the coolest thing about this list. I always learn or relearn
something about accessibility on here, going on 15 years now.
On 8/20/22, glen walker < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Good stuff, thanks everyone. I read the "understanding" sections so often
> that I'm not sure how I missed this one.
>
> And I use "close" or "info" all the time for x-close buttons and "i"
> buttons but for some reason it didn't click as the same scenario for "AA".
>
> And now I know what "human language" is too, thanks Steve. If I have any
> buttons with Klingon labels, "human language" wouldn't apply unless I'm
> speaking Klingon to another human.
> > > > >
--
Work hard. Have fun. Make history.
- Next message: Mark Magennis: "Re: Tabpanel visible focus indicator"
- Previous message: glen walker: "Re: Is it ok to intentionally break WCAG 2.5.3?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: glen walker: "Re: Is it ok to intentionally break WCAG 2.5.3?"
- View all messages in this Thread