E-mail List Archives
Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 200, Issue 10
From: Patrick H. Lauke
Date: Feb 2, 2023 2:15PM
- Next message: chagnon@pubcom.com: "Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 200, Issue 10"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 200, Issue 10"
- Next message in Thread: chagnon@pubcom.com: "Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 200, Issue 10"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 200, Issue 10"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 02/02/2023 21:14, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> On 02/02/2023 19:30, Artem Sergeevich Akopyan wrote:
>> why are we still on WCAG 2.1?
>
> 1) because 2.2 is still not finalised
> 2) even when it is, it will be a few more years until actual legislation
> references it (for fun, Section 508 in the US still references WCAG 2.0)
> 3) just like 2.1, 2.2 extends the previous spec ... so (with the
> exception of 4.1.1 which will be deprectated in 2.2) any SC currently in
> 2.1 will still be part of 2.2
Oh, and for completeness: WCAG 3 is currently only an idea, and nothing
more...
--
Patrick H. Lauke
https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
- Next message: chagnon@pubcom.com: "Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 200, Issue 10"
- Previous message: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 200, Issue 10"
- Next message in Thread: chagnon@pubcom.com: "Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 200, Issue 10"
- Previous message in Thread: Patrick H. Lauke: "Re: WebAIM-Forum Digest, Vol 200, Issue 10"
- View all messages in this Thread