E-mail List Archives
Re: No decision from the Appeals court
From: Raena Armitage
Date: Sep 30, 2004 11:15AM
- Next message: martin@nykris.com: "Auto-Reply to: WebAIM Discussion List Digest 3"
- Previous message: Hall, Kevin (K.M.): "Re: No decision from the Appeals court"
- Next message in Thread: Glenda: "Re: No decision from the Appeals court"
- Previous message in Thread: Hall, Kevin (K.M.): "Re: No decision from the Appeals court"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 01/10/2004, at 3:10 AM, khall51 wrote:
> Does anyone know how the law would handle a site that was changed
> drastically after a suit was filed? Particularly if the old pages
> cited in the suit were deleted or updated as a part of the change?
One would presume they would go right ahead and do it anyway. It'd be
like refusing to try an arson case after the building that burned down
was rebuilt.
In fact, Southwest Airlines made some efforts to make their site more
accessible not long after this complaint was made, but obviously that's
no barrier to the case making it to an appeal.
- Next message: martin@nykris.com: "Auto-Reply to: WebAIM Discussion List Digest 3"
- Previous message: Hall, Kevin (K.M.): "Re: No decision from the Appeals court"
- Next message in Thread: Glenda: "Re: No decision from the Appeals court"
- Previous message in Thread: Hall, Kevin (K.M.): "Re: No decision from the Appeals court"
- View all messages in this Thread