E-mail List Archives
Re: print style sheets (Re: Welcome to the WebAIM Discus sion List)
From: Austin, Darrel
Date: Feb 4, 2005 8:31AM
- Next message: michael.brockington: "Re: print style sheets (Re: Welcome to the WebAIM Discus sion List)"
- Previous message: michael.brockington: "Re: Welcome to the WebAIM Discussion List"
- Next message in Thread: Austin, Darrel: "Re: print style sheets (Re: Welcome to the WebAIM Discus sion List)"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread
> Must be Friday, 'cause I can't see what point you are trying to make
> here. If it in favour of alternate print versions, (as opposed to
> print stylesheets) then I think that you have got it wrong.
> WCAG 11.4 states: "If, after best efforts, you cannot create an
> accessible page, provide a link to an alternative page..."
> That point alone goes against the provision of Print Versions.
> Your refernce to users with learning impairments is weak as well - if
> they can't handle the page as is, how are they supposed to learn to
> look for a 'Print' button/icon when they want to get rid of the
> distracting images etc.?
As many have said, even those without any need for AT find 'print versions'
very useful.
Ideally, you'd have a 'print version' link, as well as use print CSS for the
screen version.
I agree that a 'print version' shouldn't be used as an excuse to NOT make
your screen version accessible, but I think most would agree that no matter
how accessible your screen version is, a very simple, content-centric print
version can still be a nice thing for the end-user.
-Darrel
- Next message: michael.brockington: "Re: print style sheets (Re: Welcome to the WebAIM Discus sion List)"
- Previous message: michael.brockington: "Re: Welcome to the WebAIM Discussion List"
- Next message in Thread: Austin, Darrel: "Re: print style sheets (Re: Welcome to the WebAIM Discus sion List)"
- Previous message in Thread: None
- View all messages in this Thread