E-mail List Archives
Re: Forms: Explicit associations and Empty controls?
From: Thomas Jedenfelt
Date: May 23, 2005 3:00PM
- Next message: Thomas Jedenfelt: "Re: Forms: Explicit associations and Empty controls?"
- Previous message: Paul Bohman: "Re: Forms: Explicit associations and Empty controls?"
- Next message in Thread: Thomas Jedenfelt: "Re: Forms: Explicit associations and Empty controls?"
- Previous message in Thread: Paul Bohman: "Re: Forms: Explicit associations and Empty controls?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for the quick reply.
Let's see if I have understood WCAG 1.0 correctly:
Checkpoint 10.2 does not suggest to circumvent explicit associations between labels and form controls.
10.2 suggests a fall back by way of containing the INPUT and the description text within the LABEL element, while still declaring (explicit association) the attributes 'for' (LABEL) and 'id' (e.g. INPUT)
Example:
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#forms-specific
In what way would CSS improve/aid(?) explicit associations between labels and form controls?
Could you point to a section in the CSS Specification?
Regards,
Thomas Jedenfelt
>
> Yes on both accounts, but I can't think of a situation where
> (particularly nowadays, using CSS) you'd need to circumvent 10.2...
>
> -- Patrick H. Lauke
--
_______________________________________________
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 8 at http://www.opera.com
Powered by Outblaze
- Next message: Thomas Jedenfelt: "Re: Forms: Explicit associations and Empty controls?"
- Previous message: Paul Bohman: "Re: Forms: Explicit associations and Empty controls?"
- Next message in Thread: Thomas Jedenfelt: "Re: Forms: Explicit associations and Empty controls?"
- Previous message in Thread: Paul Bohman: "Re: Forms: Explicit associations and Empty controls?"
- View all messages in this Thread