E-mail List Archives
Re: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)
From: Daniel Champion
Date: Jan 12, 2006 8:15AM
- Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- Previous message: John Foliot - WATS.ca: "RE: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- Next message in Thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- Previous message in Thread: John Foliot - WATS.ca: "RE: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- View all messages in this Thread
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> I'm arguing for a *sustainable* solution to the problem.
Which is unarguably in everyone's interests, and I would guess has the
support of all the participants in this thread. In this particular
instance I'm sure that solution will come in due course, but until it does
we can try to provide a temporary solution for those who need it, and
appreciate the need for the sustainable solution - the two aren't mutually
exlusive.
> So, should we avoid the fundamental discussions on the list,
> and simply accept that browsers will never work towards
> fulfilling the user's needs?
No.
Dan.
--
Daniel Champion - Web Dev Mgr - Clackmannanshire Council
e: <EMAIL REMOVED> t: 01259 452258
f: 01259 452265 w: http://www.clacksweb.org.uk
This email and any attachments have been scanned for viruses prior to leaving Clackmannanshire Council.
Clackmannanshire Council will not be liable for any losses as a result of viruses being passed on.
www.clacksweb.org.uk
- Next message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- Previous message: John Foliot - WATS.ca: "RE: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- Next message in Thread: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- Previous message in Thread: John Foliot - WATS.ca: "RE: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- View all messages in this Thread