E-mail List Archives
RE: Alt Tag [sic] Pedantry
From: Austin, Darrel
Date: Feb 16, 2006 12:09PM
- Next message: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: Alt Tag [sic] Pedantry"
- Previous message: Dagmar Noll: "Re: Alt Tag [sic] Pedantry"
- Next message in Thread: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: Alt Tag [sic] Pedantry"
- Previous message in Thread: Dagmar Noll: "Re: Alt Tag [sic] Pedantry"
- View all messages in this Thread
> Now you're just insulting the original poster. I don't see
> anything in there which indicates that he has no knowledge of
> the alt attribute and would attempt to use a non-existent
> <alt> element instead.
I'd rather not go to a mechanic that calls my timing belt the 'timer
thingamabob' and the oil pan as the 'whatchamacalit that holds that
greasy stuff'.
> I don't see what's so hard about understanding that "alt tag"
> is slang which pre-dates even WCAG 1.0, and which is in
> fairly common usage in web design.
It's not slang. It's a complete misunderstanding of a basic concept.
Tags are tags. Tags have attributes. Attributes have values.
Sometimes we web developer call them alt tags because we make a simple
slip up. Sometimes we web developers call them alt tags because we
aren't aware of those differences in the first place.
-Darrel
- Next message: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: Alt Tag [sic] Pedantry"
- Previous message: Dagmar Noll: "Re: Alt Tag [sic] Pedantry"
- Next message in Thread: Kynn Bartlett: "Re: Alt Tag [sic] Pedantry"
- Previous message in Thread: Dagmar Noll: "Re: Alt Tag [sic] Pedantry"
- View all messages in this Thread