E-mail List Archives
Re: testing web apps for accessibility
From: Sam Foster
Date: Mar 21, 2006 11:00PM
- Next message: Sam Foster: "Re: testing web apps for accessibility"
- Previous message: Sam Foster: "Re: testing web apps for accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Sam Foster: "Re: testing web apps for accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Sam Foster: "Re: testing web apps for accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread
Kynn Bartlett wrote:
> Unless Bobby testing is mandated somehow, why not just do user testing
> using actual live users with a variety of disabilities and assistive
> technologies?
For the reasons that Mark outlined - we've already ascertained that its
pretty broken, and user testing would be a lengthy and costly exercise
in frustration and futility at this point. Its something I'd love to do
though on a product that we felt more sure of. Using Bobby isnt mandated
in anyway, its basically a yes/now answer they're looking for (is or
isnt it accessible). But a "no" will be quickly followed by "no in what
way, and what do we need to do to fix it".
Sam
- Next message: Sam Foster: "Re: testing web apps for accessibility"
- Previous message: Sam Foster: "Re: testing web apps for accessibility"
- Next message in Thread: Sam Foster: "Re: testing web apps for accessibility"
- Previous message in Thread: Sam Foster: "Re: testing web apps for accessibility"
- View all messages in this Thread