E-mail List Archives
Re: ABBR vs. just spelling it out.
From: Kynn Bartlett
Date: Mar 22, 2006 8:30AM
- Next message: John E. Brandt: "RE: Accessible podcasts"
- Previous message: Sam Foster: "Re: javascript and webapps"
- Next message in Thread: Penny Roberts: "Re: ABBR vs. just spelling it out."
- Previous message in Thread: Penny Roberts: "Re: ABBR vs. just spelling it out."
- View all messages in this Thread
On 3/22/06, Penny Roberts < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
>
> Because the full form may be very long. I wouldn't want to read the
> full form every time and I certainly wouldn't want to hear it every time.
Then why are people assuming that it should be included in <abbr> every
time?
Surely current user agents AREN'T smart enough to go "okay, I've already
read this, so I won't read the <abbr>'s title out loud this time."
The suggestion was given "spell out the whole thing, and then use <abbr> on
all subsequent appearances." But that proposal leads to something which you
(Penny) admit is undesirable. Is this really "increased accessibility" or
is it subjecting blind folks to something which is unpleasant?
--Kynn
- Next message: John E. Brandt: "RE: Accessible podcasts"
- Previous message: Sam Foster: "Re: javascript and webapps"
- Next message in Thread: Penny Roberts: "Re: ABBR vs. just spelling it out."
- Previous message in Thread: Penny Roberts: "Re: ABBR vs. just spelling it out."
- View all messages in this Thread