E-mail List Archives
RE: Which should come first - navigation OR content?
From: Austin, Darrel
Date: Apr 26, 2006 10:20AM
- Next message: Jon Gunderson: "Re: Powerpoints"
- Previous message: Penny Roberts: "Re: Powerpoints"
- Next message in Thread: zara: "RE: Which should come first - navigation OR content?"
- Previous message in Thread: Paul R. Bohman: "Re: Which should come first - navigation OR content?"
- View all messages in this Thread
> 5. Intelligent software (approaching artificial intelligence)
> can parse the content, extract its semantic meaning, and
> present it to users using either standards-based or
> convention-based structure and formatting.
Regarding that, specifically the contention-based idea, how involved are
the screen reader/aural browser developers with organizations like
Web-AIM?
This seems like a perfect use for things akin to microformats.
Since we don't have a <navigation> tag right now, it'd be great if we
(we being web site developers and browser developers) simply could all
agree on a defacto microformat for accessibility enhancements.
Perhaps everyone agrees that class="siteNavigation" means just
that...that this chunk of content on is site navigation for the page.
Doing that would enable screen readers/aural browsers to look for that
first, and act upon it however they wanted to.
Just some morning pre-coffee ramblings...
-Darrel
- Next message: Jon Gunderson: "Re: Powerpoints"
- Previous message: Penny Roberts: "Re: Powerpoints"
- Next message in Thread: zara: "RE: Which should come first - navigation OR content?"
- Previous message in Thread: Paul R. Bohman: "Re: Which should come first - navigation OR content?"
- View all messages in this Thread