WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

RE: WCAG 2.0 Last Call

for

From: Alastair Campbell
Date: May 2, 2006 4:00AM

Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
> despite its limitations, WCAG 1.0 was fairly good
> because of its relatively concise nature. You could hit a clueless
> developer over the head with it without actually killing
> them.

I'm not so sure, I think I knocked out quite a few ;)

It's conciseness meant it took a lot of reading around and
help/explanations to implement properly.

> they'd be very unlikely to work their way through those 600
> odd pages.

I think they are damned either way, but good examples (technology
specific) and good linking between reasons and examples should help.
I'll just have to give up sleep to get through them myself!

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--
Alastair Campbell | Director of User Experience
t. +44 (0)117 929 7333 | <EMAIL REMOVED>

Keep up to date with industry and Nomensa news, sign up to Nomensa
newsletters:
http://www.nomensa.com/news/nomensa-newsletters.html

Nomensa Email Disclaimer:
http://www.nomensa.com/email-disclaimer.html