E-mail List Archives
Re: Heading levels
From: Christian Heilmann
Date: Jun 25, 2006 12:30PM
- Next message: zara: "RE: Heading levels"
- Previous message: Al Sparber: "Re: Elitism (was: New WebAIM Site Released)"
- Next message in Thread: zara: "RE: Heading levels"
- Previous message in Thread: Al Sparber: "Re: Heading levels"
- View all messages in this Thread
> Can someone provide a plain language explanation of why non-sequential
> headings might be considered inaccessible? For example, the following
> scenario fails in an online automated checker.
which is a proof that online automated checkers are just not a valid
test for accessibility but can only be considered an aid for human
testing. As a human I consider your heading structure alright, for
example, and I guess a blind user using the heading navigation option
would agree.
No point discussing the value of automated testing as the only means
of testing _again_.
--
Chris Heilmann
Blog: http://www.wait-till-i.com
Writing: http://icant.co.uk/
Binaries: http://www.onlinetools.org/
- Next message: zara: "RE: Heading levels"
- Previous message: Al Sparber: "Re: Elitism (was: New WebAIM Site Released)"
- Next message in Thread: zara: "RE: Heading levels"
- Previous message in Thread: Al Sparber: "Re: Heading levels"
- View all messages in this Thread