E-mail List Archives
Re: multimedia accessibility a specialist skillset?
From: John E. Brandt
Date: Dec 14, 2006 12:16PM
- Next message: Jon Gunderson: "New tools for checking accessibility of dynamically generated web resources available"
- Previous message: Al Sparber: "Re: multimedia accessibility a specialist skillset?"
- Next message in Thread: Emma Duke-Williams: "Re: multimedia accessibility a specialist skillset?"
- Previous message in Thread: Al Sparber: "Re: multimedia accessibility a specialist skillset?"
- View all messages in this Thread
I just attended a statewide IT conference and sat in on three sessions
related to "Usability" and Web 2.0. In nearly all the cases presented,
accessibility was not even mentioned other than to note it was a subset of
Usability. I was frankly a bit horrified when two women presenters talked
about all the new gadgets out there to soup-up your website...and then they
mumbled something about needing to create an HTML option for accessibility
purposes. When I called them to task on this, they danced around and gave
all of those "stupid" answers like, "You need to know your clientele..."
Then they basically admitted they knew next to nothing about making this
"stuff" accessible, but "we have a colleague who will be here later..."
Throughout the day in several presentations from different people, including
Eric Miller who led the Semantic Web Initiative at W3C, folks kept saying
things like "bad programming," or "lazy coding" causes this or that to
happen. The implication was that "usability" means "good coding" and "hard
work."
Clearly, human nature is to find the path to least resistance, and
accessibility presents challenges and the "hard work" that many developers
avoid. Some are even adamant that we shouldn't even bother with this
marginal community (Actual Quote: "How many blind people are there
anyway?"). It helps me to understand why the community of people with
disabilities and advocates for this community have had to work hard to
create laws and rules.
In all my workshops, I always warn people about what has happened elsewhere
and it is "just a matter of time" before this will be the law of the land
(e.g., "the Target.com case"). With their heads in the sand and deadlines to
meet, they continue to cut corners.
So, I guess my answer to your question: "Can anyone foresee a time when
accessibility, even for rich media, will be considered standards based
design and not a specialist activity?" - not unless it becomes law. If it is
left to be optional. It will always be optional.
Just my opinion...
~j
John E. Brandt
Augusta, Maine USA
www.jebswebs.com
- Next message: Jon Gunderson: "New tools for checking accessibility of dynamically generated web resources available"
- Previous message: Al Sparber: "Re: multimedia accessibility a specialist skillset?"
- Next message in Thread: Emma Duke-Williams: "Re: multimedia accessibility a specialist skillset?"
- Previous message in Thread: Al Sparber: "Re: multimedia accessibility a specialist skillset?"
- View all messages in this Thread