WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Thread: it may not be a big site....

for

Number of posts in this thread: 2 (In chronological order)

From: Emma Jane Hogbin
Date: Wed, Aug 28 2002 1:50PM
Subject: it may not be a big site....
No previous message | Next message →

....but it is a small site.

(Apologies if you've received this more than once.)

If anyone has some spare time and is interested, I'm in the middle of
launching a new site using CSS instead of tables. (Although it really was
meant to be a table site ...) The layout is based on glish.com's holy grail
layout (although I feel like I've found some holy bugs -- which are
probably not really bugs but mistakes from the fatigure).

http://borderlines.ca/testing/

I ran it through Bobby and received only "user checks" for each of priority
one, two and three; I'm pretty sure all of the (eight) pages are XHTML 1.0
Transitional; and the CSS should validate as CSS2.

emma


--
Emma Jane Hogbin
[ 416 417 2868 ] [ = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] [ www.xtrinsic.com ]


----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/


From: Laurie Davis-Covin
Date: Thu, Aug 29 2002 9:16AM
Subject: Re: it may not be a big site....
← Previous message | No next message

Have you tried using class instead of id? May not be the solution
afterall, but I have read where that can make a difference. Sorry I'm not
more help.



At 05:02 PM 8/28/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>....but it is a small site.
>
>(Apologies if you've received this more than once.)
>
>If anyone has some spare time and is interested, I'm in the middle of
>launching a new site using CSS instead of tables. (Although it really was
>meant to be a table site ...) The layout is based on glish.com's holy
>grail layout (although I feel like I've found some holy bugs -- which are
>probably not really bugs but mistakes from the fatigure).
>
>http://borderlines.ca/testing/
>
>I ran it through Bobby and received only "user checks" for each of
>priority one, two and three; I'm pretty sure all of the (eight) pages are
>XHTML 1.0 Transitional; and the CSS should validate as CSS2.
>
>emma
>
>
>--
>Emma Jane Hogbin
>[ 416 417 2868 ] [ = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] [ www.xtrinsic.com ]
>
>
>----
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives, visit
>http://www.webaim.org/discussion/

Laurie Davis-Covin, Web Specialist
SAIC @ National Institute of
Standards and Technology
100 Bureau Drive
Admin. Building, Room E 220
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Ph: 301-975-8027





----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/