E-mail List Archives
Thread: browser zoom VS text zoom
Number of posts in this thread: 5 (In chronological order)
From: Jennison Asuncion
Date: Mon, Aug 05 2013 12:51PM
Subject: browser zoom VS text zoom
No previous message | Next message →
Hi,
This was a blog post recently written by Denis Boudreau that I thought folk here might find of itnerest:
Why Browser Zoom Testing Sucks for Accessibility http://www.denisboudreau.org/blog/2013/07/why-browser-zoom-testing-sucks-for-accessibility.
Jennison
Jennison Mark Asuncion
Co-Director, Adaptech Research Network http://www.adaptech.org
LinkedIn at http://www.linkedin.com/in/jennison
Follow me on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/jennison
Accessibility Camp Toronto http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeP5Kl4GDgA
From: Jared Smith
Date: Mon, Aug 05 2013 12:54PM
Subject: Re: browser zoom VS text zoom
← Previous message | Next message →
... and a very good rebuttal at
http://alastairc.ac/2013/08/browser-zoom-great-for-accessibility/
Jared
From: Jennifer Sutton
Date: Mon, Aug 05 2013 12:55PM
Subject: Re: browser zoom VS text zoom
← Previous message | Next message →
I'd call this browser zoom vs. text resize, perhaps for the sake of a
bit more accuracy.
At any rate, here are two more posts that have circulated as a result
of Denis's post:
BIK BITV-Test | Articles | Interpreting WCAG 2.0 - Text resizing: Why
page zoom is not good enough - or is it? (update 10 January 2012)
http://www.bitvtest.eu/articles/article/lesen/zoom-and-text-resizing.html
and
Browser zoom great for accessibility | AlastairC
http://alastairc.ac/2013/08/browser-zoom-great-for-accessibility/
Folks may find it helpful to read the comments and contribute their own.
Jennifer
From: Alastair Campbell
Date: Tue, Aug 06 2013 3:19AM
Subject: Re: browser zoom VS text zoom
← Previous message | Next message →
I think it's been a very useful discussion for two reasons:
1. Responsive web design (RWD) is a current trend, and although few
sites are currently responsive, a lot of sites currently in
development will be. RWD has a big impact on how browser zoom works,
for the better IMO.
2. WCAG 2.0 was released before media queries were reliable in current
browsers, and zoom was universally the default in desktop browsers. I
think it might be time to start refining the success criteria for SC
1.4.4.
Jared commented on my post (the pro-zoom one) that he would structure
passing WCAG2 1.4.4 as:
Level AA
- Zoom at 200%
- Text sizing at 150%
Level AAA
- Zoom at 200% with no horizontal scrolling
- Text sizing at 200%
Personally, given the ease of supporting zoom in RWD I would structure
a pass at Level AA as either:
- Zoom at 200% with no horizontal scrolling or loss of functionality.
- Text-sizing at 200% without loosing content or functionality.
Admittedly these methods (allowing for text-sizing and RWD) are not
mutually exclusive, you could use media queries without full RWD, and
in RWD you could buffer the text to allow for some text expansion.
Some, probably not 200% though.
Jared pointed out that many of his clients have real difficulty
allowing for 200% increase, and I've had similar experiences,
especially for CMS driven sites where the content varies. The key
difference now is that RWD provides a way of dealing with the
situation of having a full screen and still zooming in. Depending on
the layout you can drop columns, or hide menus behind a button, or
various other things.
Given how easy it is to support a good zoom experience in RWD (which
many developers are using and spending time testing anyway), I don't
think 200% zoom without loosing content/functionality is a hardship.
However, there still needs to be the non-RWD clause as well...
-Alastair
From: Alastair Campbell
Date: Tue, Aug 06 2013 3:37AM
Subject: Re: browser zoom VS text zoom
← Previous message | No next message
I wrote:
> I think it might be time to start refining the success criteria for SC 1.4.4.
Sorry, poor wording there on my part, I meant "Sufficient Techniques",
the normative text is fine.
-Alastair