E-mail List Archives
Thread: RE: Blank alt attributes for images - best practise?
Number of posts in this thread: 2 (In chronological order)
From: FOX, Jake
Date: Mon, Oct 06 2003 7:55AM
Subject: RE: Blank alt attributes for images - best practise?
No previous message | Next message →
Just a suggestion but there are examples where images have used alt="*" for
similar situations.
This at least provides some content in the alt tag and doesn't seem as if
anything's missing that should be there.
It implies that the tag was meant to be left empty as opposed to being left
empty accidentally.
would like to hear everyone else's views on this...
-Jake.
**********************************************************************
This email and any files sent with it are intended only for the named
recipient. If you are not the named recipient please telephone/email
the sender immediately. You should not disclose the content or
take/retain/distribute any copies.
**********************************************************************
Norwich Union Life & Pensions Limited
Registered Office: 2 Rougier Street, York, YO90 1UU
Registered in England Number 3253947
A member of the Norwich Union Marketing Group
Members of which are Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
For further enquiries 01603 622200
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, suspend, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
From: gez
Date: Mon, Oct 06 2003 8:12AM
Subject: Re: Blank alt attributes for images - best practise?
← Previous message | No next message
Joe Clark's Building Accessible Websites, "The Image Problem"
(http://www.joeclark.org/book/sashay/serialization/Chapter06.html) describes
how to specify the alt attribute for images in detail, and it's all good
advice. To summarise, he advocates using alt="" for images that have no
meaning, such as spacer images. For bullets, he advocates marking them up
properly, and changing the style of the bullet using CSS. If you absolutely
must use a graphic for a bullet that isn't marked up correctly, he suggest
using alt="*".
If your code is semantically correct, and you've separated the style from
the presentation using CSS, there's usually no requirement for empty alt
attributes, or at least it's drastically reduced.
Best regards.
Gez Lemon
_____________________________
Supplement your vitamins
Web: http://www.juicystudio.com
Email: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
Keeping developers informed!
----- Original Message -----
From: "FOX, Jake" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
To: < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 3:42 PM
Subject: RE: Blank alt attributes for images - best practise?
> Just a suggestion but there are examples where images have used alt="*"
for
> similar situations.
>
> This at least provides some content in the alt tag and doesn't seem as if
> anything's missing that should be there.
>
> It implies that the tag was meant to be left empty as opposed to being
left
> empty accidentally.
>
>
> would like to hear everyone else's views on this...
>
> -Jake.
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This email and any files sent with it are intended only for the named
> recipient. If you are not the named recipient please telephone/email
> the sender immediately. You should not disclose the content or
> take/retain/distribute any copies.
> **********************************************************************
>
>
>
> Norwich Union Life & Pensions Limited
> Registered Office: 2 Rougier Street, York, YO90 1UU
> Registered in England Number 3253947
> A member of the Norwich Union Marketing Group
> Members of which are Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services
Authority.
>
> For further enquiries 01603 622200
>
>
> ----
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, suspend, or view list archives,
> visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
>
>
>
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, suspend, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/