WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Thread: Re: looking for htmltechniqueto provide a methodto skiprepetitive navigation linksi

for

Number of posts in this thread: 1 (In chronological order)

From: smithj7
Date: Fri, Oct 13 2006 12:20AM
Subject: Re: looking for htmltechniqueto provide a methodto skiprepetitive navigation linksi
No previous message | No next message

OOPs, I'm bad. I hadn't thought of individuals using magnification devices.

The skip navigation on our page is not visible. I was following my parent's
organization look and feel required. And their site templates were such that
I made ours somewhat LOOK like theres but changed the coding.

Should the skip info be visible? What about access key info?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Egan, Bim" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
To: "WebAIM Discussion List" < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 6:29 AM
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] looking for html techniqueto provide a methodto
skiprepetitive navigation linksi


Another group of people who benefit from "Skip" links is screen magnifier
users.

When your viewport is a fraction of the screen, roughly the size of a credit
card, it is very useful to be able to have the focus (and viewport) snap to
the region of a page that you're interested in. It saves a lot of time
panning round for the required content.

On this basis I'd say that skip links should not only be available, but also
visible.

Bim

________________________________

From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = on behalf of Penny Roberts
Sent: Thu 12/10/2006 10:54
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] looking for html technique to provide a methodto
skiprepetitive navigation linksi



Patrick Lauke wrote:
>> Penny Roberts
>
>> Err.. no you didn't ;-)
>
> Ah, I did, but I can see how my convoluted sentence is misleading
>
>> I use "keyboard navigation" as a synonym for non-mouse,
>> non-pointing-device style (including head wands and similar) interaction
>
> I was meaning: head wands are included in the "pointing device" group of
> interactions.
>
> Soz for the confusion :)

Aha, yes, now I get it. (Blame a disturbed night.... still half
asleep... neighbour's car alarm...)

Penny






--
DISCLAIMER:

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it
and any attachments from your system.

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it
cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


>
>
>
>