WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Thread: Update on Section 508 Refresh

for

Number of posts in this thread: 10 (In chronological order)

From: Janet Sylvia
Date: Thu, Jul 28 2011 12:27PM
Subject: Update on Section 508 Refresh
No previous message | Next message →

All,

An update was just sent from the U.S. Access Board regarding the 508 Refresh (i.e. the "Draft Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Standards and Guidelines"):

Status Update from the Access Board on the ICT Refresh
On July 13, 2011, the Access Board voted to release a second draft of the ICT rule near the end of September 2011. We are working with the Office of Management and Budget on the details. The Board is taking this step to facilitate the collection of cost information and to promote harmonization with standards efforts in Europe.


Janet

Janet Sylvia
Web Accessibility Group
University of Georgia

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Thu, Jul 28 2011 1:03PM
Subject: Re: Update on Section 508 Refresh
← Previous message | Next message →

The Access Board list sent this announcement today:
Status Update from the Access Board on the ICT Refresh
On July 13, 2011, the Access Board voted to release a second draft of the ICT rule near the end of September 2011. We are working with the Office of Management and Budget on the details. The Board is taking this step to facilitate the collection of cost information and to promote harmonization with standards efforts in Europe.

To me this isn't indicating a new review, just that the standards portion of what will constitute the NPRM is to be available in September. The regulatory language and/or budgetary review is apparently needing more time.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe Systems

= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
http://twitter.com/awkawk
http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility


-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of John Foliot
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:58 PM
To: 'WebAIM Discussion List'
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Update on Section 508 Refresh

Jared, do you have a link to the second announcement?

JF

> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto:webaim-forum-
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Jared Smith
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 11:57 AM
> To: WebAIM Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Update on Section 508 Refresh
>
> Two announcements in the same week - one that the Department of
> Justice will not be providing web accessibility regulations for the
> Americans with Disabilities Act until "at least 2013"
> (http://lflegal.com/2011/07/web-delay/), and another that Section 508
> guidelines are going through yet another lengthy draft review. Happy
> 21st anniversary, ADA.
>
> Jared
>

From: John Foliot
Date: Thu, Jul 28 2011 1:15PM
Subject: Re: Update on Section 508 Refresh
← Previous message | Next message →

Jared, do you have a link to the second announcement?

JF

> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto:webaim-forum-
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Jared Smith
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 11:57 AM
> To: WebAIM Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Update on Section 508 Refresh
>
> Two announcements in the same week - one that the Department of
> Justice will not be providing web accessibility regulations for the
> Americans with Disabilities Act until "at least 2013"
> (http://lflegal.com/2011/07/web-delay/), and another that Section 508
> guidelines are going through yet another lengthy draft review. Happy
> 21st anniversary, ADA.
>
> Jared
>

From: Jared Smith
Date: Thu, Jul 28 2011 1:21PM
Subject: Re: Update on Section 508 Refresh
← Previous message | Next message →

Two announcements in the same week - one that the Department of
Justice will not be providing web accessibility regulations for the
Americans with Disabilities Act until "at least 2013"
(http://lflegal.com/2011/07/web-delay/), and another that Section 508
guidelines are going through yet another lengthy draft review. Happy
21st anniversary, ADA.

Jared

From: John Foliot
Date: Thu, Jul 28 2011 1:51PM
Subject: Re: Update on Section 508 Refresh
← Previous message | Next message →

Thanks Andrew.

JF


> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto:webaim-forum-
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 12:02 PM
> To: WebAIM Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Update on Section 508 Refresh
>
> The Access Board list sent this announcement today:
> Status Update from the Access Board on the ICT Refresh
> On July 13, 2011, the Access Board voted to release a second draft of
> the ICT rule near the end of September 2011. We are working with the
> Office of Management and Budget on the details. The Board is taking
> this step to facilitate the collection of cost information and to
> promote harmonization with standards efforts in Europe.
>
> To me this isn't indicating a new review, just that the standards
> portion of what will constitute the NPRM is to be available in
> September. The regulatory language and/or budgetary review is
> apparently needing more time.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Accessibility
> Adobe Systems
>
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto:webaim-forum-
> = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of John Foliot
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:58 PM
> To: 'WebAIM Discussion List'
> Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Update on Section 508 Refresh
>
> Jared, do you have a link to the second announcement?
>
> JF
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto:webaim-forum-
> > = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Jared Smith
> > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 11:57 AM
> > To: WebAIM Discussion List
> > Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Update on Section 508 Refresh
> >
> > Two announcements in the same week - one that the Department of
> > Justice will not be providing web accessibility regulations for the
> > Americans with Disabilities Act until "at least 2013"
> > (http://lflegal.com/2011/07/web-delay/), and another that Section 508
> > guidelines are going through yet another lengthy draft review. Happy
> > 21st anniversary, ADA.
> >
> > Jared
> >

From: Janet Sylvia
Date: Thu, Jul 28 2011 2:12PM
Subject: Re: Update on Section 508 Refresh
← Previous message | Next message →

If you'd like to receive email updates from the Access Board about the 508 Refresh, you can visit the web page below and "Sign up to receive updates on this rulemaking".

http://www.access-board.gov/508.htm


Janet

Janet Sylvia
Web Accessibility Group
University of Georgia

From: Jared Smith
Date: Thu, Jul 28 2011 2:54PM
Subject: Re: Update on Section 508 Refresh
← Previous message | Next message →

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:

> To me this isn't indicating a new review, just that the standards portion of what will constitute the NPRM is to be available in September.  The regulatory language and/or budgetary review is apparently needing more time.

I read "draft of the ICT rule" to indicate that additional changes and
review are coming. And how can the regulatory language and budgetary
review be completed on guidelines that have not yet been released in a
finalized state?

I hope you're right and that the end is coming near(er).

Jared

From: Bevi Chagnon
Date: Thu, Jul 28 2011 3:21PM
Subject: Re: Update on Section 508 Refresh
← Previous message | Next message →

Jared, here in Washington, we review the reviews of the reviews. <grin>

But on a serious note, the revised draft of the ICT rule needs to be
publically released, allowing for further comments from the public before it
can be sent on its merry way to Congress.

This is the Board's formal notice that they've reached that step in the
process.

The ICT rules will also have to be reviewed by OMB (Office of Management and
Budget) to determine how much money it's going to cost the federal
government to deploy the ruling, as in how much will Sec. 508 requirements
add to the cost of creating and maintaining a federal website or publishing
their electronic documents, including Word documents, spreadsheets,
PowerPoint slideshows, and PDFs. This assessment is required by federal law.


In the end, today's notice means that the revised ICT rules are moving one
more step up the ladder. It's a positive note!

— Bevi Chagnon

-----------------------------------------------------
Bevi Chagnon | = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
PubCom — Trainers, consultants, designers, and developers
Print | Web | Acrobat | XML | Section 508
-----------------------------------------------------
Classes: www.PubCom.com/classes
Bevi's Blog: www.pubcom.com/blog
-----------------------------------------------------
*** It's our 30th Year! ***




-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Jared Smith
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 4:55 PM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Update on Section 508 Refresh

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
wrote:

> To me this isn't indicating a new review, just that the standards portion
of what will constitute the NPRM is to be available in September.  The
regulatory language and/or budgetary review is apparently needing more time.

I read "draft of the ICT rule" to indicate that additional changes and
review are coming. And how can the regulatory language and budgetary review
be completed on guidelines that have not yet been released in a finalized
state?

I hope you're right and that the end is coming near(er).

Jared

From: Pratik Patel
Date: Thu, Jul 28 2011 3:30PM
Subject: Re: Update on Section 508 Refresh
← Previous message | Next message →

I'm not certain that this is putting one step forward on the road to final
regulations. This will be a second draft of the ANPRM and not an NPRM. Why
could the budgetary analysis not have been done at the NPRM stage?

Pratik

-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Bevi Chagnon
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 5:23 PM
To: 'WebAIM Discussion List'
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Update on Section 508 Refresh

Jared, here in Washington, we review the reviews of the reviews. <grin>

But on a serious note, the revised draft of the ICT rule needs to be
publically released, allowing for further comments from the public before it
can be sent on its merry way to Congress.

This is the Board's formal notice that they've reached that step in the
process.

The ICT rules will also have to be reviewed by OMB (Office of Management and
Budget) to determine how much money it's going to cost the federal
government to deploy the ruling, as in how much will Sec. 508 requirements
add to the cost of creating and maintaining a federal website or publishing
their electronic documents, including Word documents, spreadsheets,
PowerPoint slideshows, and PDFs. This assessment is required by federal law.


In the end, today's notice means that the revised ICT rules are moving one
more step up the ladder. It's a positive note!

— Bevi Chagnon

-----------------------------------------------------
Bevi Chagnon | = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
PubCom — Trainers, consultants, designers, and developers
Print | Web | Acrobat | XML | Section 508
-----------------------------------------------------
Classes: www.PubCom.com/classes
Bevi's Blog: www.pubcom.com/blog
-----------------------------------------------------
*** It's our 30th Year! ***




-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
[mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Jared Smith
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 4:55 PM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Update on Section 508 Refresh

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = >
wrote:

> To me this isn't indicating a new review, just that the standards portion
of what will constitute the NPRM is to be available in September.  The
regulatory language and/or budgetary review is apparently needing more time.

I read "draft of the ICT rule" to indicate that additional changes and
review are coming. And how can the regulatory language and budgetary review
be completed on guidelines that have not yet been released in a finalized
state?

I hope you're right and that the end is coming near(er).

Jared

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick
Date: Thu, Jul 28 2011 3:48PM
Subject: Re: Update on Section 508 Refresh
← Previous message | No next message

Yeah, I'm not 100% certain, so you may be right. However, even if my understanding is correct and the draft standards are for the NPRM, it is still a proposed rulemaking, which means comments and possibly changes. This was always part of the schedule.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe Systems

= EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
http://twitter.com/awkawk
http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility


-----Original Message-----
From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ] On Behalf Of Jared Smith
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 4:55 PM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Update on Section 508 Refresh

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick < = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = > wrote:

> To me this isn't indicating a new review, just that the standards portion of what will constitute the NPRM is to be available in September.  The regulatory language and/or budgetary review is apparently needing more time.

I read "draft of the ICT rule" to indicate that additional changes and review are coming. And how can the regulatory language and budgetary review be completed on guidelines that have not yet been released in a finalized state?

I hope you're right and that the end is coming near(er).

Jared