E-mail List Archives
Thread: Strong vs. Bold
Number of posts in this thread: 2 (In chronological order)
From: p.karol@csuohio.edu
Date: Thu, Jul 11 2002 2:07PM
Subject: Strong vs. Bold
No previous message | Next message →
Hello good people;
I see some mention that we should use <strong> raher than <bold> for
emphasis.
Is this a good idea at this point?
Most of the HTML editors seem to use <b>.
Can anyone give me some feedback on which is better to use?
-KaroL
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
From: John Foliot - bytown internet
Date: Thu, Jul 11 2002 6:59PM
Subject: RE: Strong vs. Bold
← Previous message | No next message
While visually they may appear the same in most browsers, strong is a better
description of the logic behind the usage. I can speak strong(ly), but I
cannot speak bold (or even better, I can say something with emphasis (<em>)
but I cannot say it in italics <i>). I am not aware of any speach
technology which currently makes the distinction, but, like everything else,
soon come...
HomeSite HTML editor allows you to alternately use <strong> and <em>, right
down to changing the keyboard shortcuts (for example "Ctrl+B" produces
<strong> when configured as such)
JF
> -----Original Message-----
> From: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = [mailto: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED = ]
> Sent: July 11, 2002 5:01 PM
> To: = EMAIL ADDRESS REMOVED =
> Subject: Strong vs. Bold
>
>
> Hello good people;
>
> I see some mention that we should use <strong> raher than <bold> for
> emphasis.
> Is this a good idea at this point?
> Most of the HTML editors seem to use <b>.
>
> Can anyone give me some feedback on which is better to use?
>
> -KaroL
>
>
> ----
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
> visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
>
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/