E-mail List Archives
Re: Well formed verses Valid code
From: Derek Featherstone
Date: Feb 24, 2007 7:10AM
- Next message: smithj7@peoplepc.com: "Re: Well formed verses Valid code"
- Previous message: smithj7@peoplepc.com: "Re: Well formed verses Valid code"
- Next message in Thread: smithj7@peoplepc.com: "Re: Well formed verses Valid code"
- Previous message in Thread: smithj7@peoplepc.com: "Re: Well formed verses Valid code"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 2/24/07, <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:
>I feel that a DTD is important and cleaning-up codes to comply with
>the DTD is a first step, to accessiblity. (work for blind services -
>found some coding mistakes that cause hic-ups with speech)
If ever you find errors in validation that cause issues with speech
technology such as screen readers, please please please publish the
details. Even if it is just a quick post to this list so that it gets
documented - we need to be sure that any cases or examples where this
happens are availalble for everyone to see.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Derek.
--
Derek Featherstone <EMAIL REMOVED>
tel: +1 613-599-9784 1-866-932-4878 (toll-free in North America)
Web Development: http://www.furtherahead.com
Personal: http://www.boxofchocolates.ca
Web Standards: http://www.webstandards.org
- Next message: smithj7@peoplepc.com: "Re: Well formed verses Valid code"
- Previous message: smithj7@peoplepc.com: "Re: Well formed verses Valid code"
- Next message in Thread: smithj7@peoplepc.com: "Re: Well formed verses Valid code"
- Previous message in Thread: smithj7@peoplepc.com: "Re: Well formed verses Valid code"
- View all messages in this Thread