E-mail List Archives
Re: Well formed verses Valid code
From: smithj7
Date: Feb 24, 2007 8:10AM
- Next message: Andy Mabbett: "Re: address tag"
- Previous message: Derek Featherstone: "Re: Well formed verses Valid code"
- Next message in Thread: Alastair Campbell: "Re: Well formed verses Valid code"
- Previous message in Thread: Derek Featherstone: "Re: Well formed verses Valid code"
- View all messages in this Thread
Will do!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Derek Featherstone" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
To: "WebAIM Discussion List" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Well formed verses Valid code
> On 2/24/07, <EMAIL REMOVED> wrote:
>
>>I feel that a DTD is important and cleaning-up codes to comply with
>>the DTD is a first step, to accessiblity. (work for blind services -
>>found some coding mistakes that cause hic-ups with speech)
>
>
> If ever you find errors in validation that cause issues with speech
> technology such as screen readers, please please please publish the
> details. Even if it is just a quick post to this list so that it gets
> documented - we need to be sure that any cases or examples where this
> happens are availalble for everyone to see.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best regards,
> Derek.
> --
> Derek Featherstone <EMAIL REMOVED>
> tel: +1 613-599-9784 1-866-932-4878 (toll-free in North America)
> Web Development: http://www.furtherahead.com
> Personal: http://www.boxofchocolates.ca
> Web Standards: http://www.webstandards.org
>
- Next message: Andy Mabbett: "Re: address tag"
- Previous message: Derek Featherstone: "Re: Well formed verses Valid code"
- Next message in Thread: Alastair Campbell: "Re: Well formed verses Valid code"
- Previous message in Thread: Derek Featherstone: "Re: Well formed verses Valid code"
- View all messages in this Thread