E-mail List Archives
Re: Colour contrast standard
From: Alastair Campbell
Date: Oct 22, 2007 7:40AM
- Next message: Joshue O Connor: "Re: Software to simulate hand tremors?"
- Previous message: Sarah Horton: "WUDNE 2007 almost full!"
- Next message in Thread: tedd: "Re: Colour contrast standard"
- Previous message in Thread: Mike Osborne - AccEase: "Colour contrast standard"
- View all messages in this Thread
On 10/16/07, Mike Osborne - AccEase < <EMAIL REMOVED> > wrote:
> Are these numbers arbitrary or is one right and the other wrong? Is 500 too
> much or is 400 inadequate?
I seriously doubt there is a real answer to that, for most people the
HP one is fine, but I'm sure there are some who benefit from very high
contrast.
It is a sliding scale, and you could argue that those with a need for
extreme contrast should have tools (e.g. user style sheets / Opera /
system tools) that provide that regardless of what the site does.
If you look at the colour range allowed by the W3C one, it doesn't
give you a whole lot of flexibility in the design, although I'm not
sure how the WCAG 2 algorithm varies from version 1? I'm under the
impression it's not directly comparable, although I'll check with a
colleague who put together some tools based on it.
Kind regards,
-Alastair
- Next message: Joshue O Connor: "Re: Software to simulate hand tremors?"
- Previous message: Sarah Horton: "WUDNE 2007 almost full!"
- Next message in Thread: tedd: "Re: Colour contrast standard"
- Previous message in Thread: Mike Osborne - AccEase: "Colour contrast standard"
- View all messages in this Thread